How anyone can challenge the No Jab No Pay Legislation individually.
Bottom Line : No Love is needed so long as there is a mutually exclusive (de facto) relationship.
The law he quotes and cites throughout the Video sounds impressive to a layperson. However anyone who has studied Constitutional Law and Administrative Law is laying on the floor pissing themselves laughing at this fool.
This Court does not have jurisdiction to hear and determine the application Mr Barkla seeks to bring against the Acting Court of Appeal Registrar, and the District Registrar was correct in deciding to refuse to accept the rejected documents.
“It is simply unacceptable for businesses to raise prices before applying a discount in order to give consumers the misleading impression that they are obtaining a larger percentage discount than is actually the case,”
Following an investigation, the ACCC considered that the clause was an unfair contract term which was likely to contravene the Australian Consumer Law (ACL). The ACCC also considered that Exetel’s advertising of these fixed term plans was likely to be misleading because it represented that consumers would receive the service for the 12-month fixed term, when this was not necessarily the case.
“Businesses are expected to take appropriate and effective steps to ensure that their staff understand the rights of consumers and the obligations of businesses under the consumer guarantees provided by the Australian Consumer Law,” Dr Schaper said.
In this case MacDougal v Mitchell  NSWCA 389 after all the pain and suffering and having to go to Court to recover the costs of the damage done to him, the Court awarded Mr MacDougal $10,000 in aggravated damages and $20,000 in Exemplary damages.
This paper examines the legality and enforceability of the new Australian Government “No Jab, No Pay/Play” Legislation with the view of potential aspects to challenge the validity of this new law.