The U.C.C (Universal Commercial Code) and Australian Law



OPCA theorists often insist that THE UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE is some sort of “international law” that applies to every nation that trades with the United States, but this is completely false.
ucc
The U.C.C. operates mainly in the U.S. where it is used to harmonise the law of sales and other commercial transactions across the nation through its adoption by all states. The Uniform Commercial Code has no jurisdiction in Australia, nor any other sovereign nation, although some countries have included certain parts of it into their own provisions to govern commercial transactions with U.S. companies and institutions.For these reasons we have adopted Article 9 and Article 3 in Australia, which are of course superceded by our own nations state and federal laws. Article 9 is “Secured Transactions”, covering transactions secured by security interests between banks, and Article 3 is “Negotiable Instruments” covering promissory notes, bills of exchange, banknotes, demand draft and cheques, for the purposes of trade with U.S. companies and institutions.

http://www.metrocorpcounsel.com/articles/13084/international-ucc-equivalents

Article 9 does not even govern real property security interests, only certain fixtures to real property. Mortgages, deeds of trust, and installment land contracts, which are the principal forms of real property security interests, remain governed by state laws. The closest thing we have to the U.C.C. in Australia is the Personal Property Securities Register but its not the same thing.

http://www.ppsr.gov.au/

In the Personal Property Securities Act it also clarifies the exclusion of current laws…

PERSONAL PROPERTY SECURITIES ACT 2009 – SECT 254(1)

“This Act is not intended to exclude or limit the operation of any of the following laws (a concurrent law), to the extent that the law is capable of operating concurrently with this Act:
(a) a law of the Commonwealth (other than this Act);
(b) a law of a State or Territory;
(c) the general law.”

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/ppsa2009356/s254.html

This exclusion of current laws is also clarified in the Corporations Act that all foreign companies are subject to…

CORPORATIONS ACT 2001 – SECT 5E(1)

“The Corporations legislation is not intended to exclude or limit the concurrent operation of any law of a State or Territory.”

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/ca2001172/s5e.html

Source : Rob Sudy’s – The Organized Pseudo Commercial Argument

 

###########################################

NOTHING IN THIS WEBSITE IS TO BE CONSTRUED AS LEGAL ADVICE, IT IS PURELY INFORMATION TO ASSIST YOUR UNDERSTANDING, WHICH WE STRONGLY RECOMMEND YOU BRING TO A LAWYER AND URGE YOU TO SEEK INDEPENDENT LEGAL ADVICE.

###########################################



3 thoughts on “The U.C.C (Universal Commercial Code) and Australian Law

  1. Lawyers are puppets for the BAR just as doctors are puppets for BIG Pharma – two different arms of the same beast. Don’t expect truth or justice to come from a lawyer’s mouth – they are already in bed with the enemy. They are either aware of the fraud & yet still choose to play with the devil – or still asleep to this & are just a pawn in the game. The Commonwealth of Australia is an LLC registered in USA which can be clearly seen at https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?CIK=0000805157&action=getcompany

    1. This E-Book is the most comprehensive guide to the delusion that some people call “Freeman” or “Sovereign” or the countless other names that the Courts have characterized as Pseudo Legal (stuff that sounds like it is legal talk but more accurately described as gibberish) that collectively have been labelled OPCA Litigants.

      This book will help you understand the myths and break it down in simple English why these groups exist and how they are misleading people into harm.

      http://para-legal.org.au/sovereignfreemam-debunked/the-freeman-delusion-free-e-book-by-robert-sudy/

Leave a Reply

Or